What do you mean by return?
I do not mean, undelivered shipments, they are a different case altogether. I only mean shipments returned by buyers after accepting delivery.
Who is liable to pay return shipping charges?
Depends on case to case basis.
Who are the parties involved?
Seller, Marketplace, Buyer & Carrier
As a general rule of thumb, seller should be liable to cover return shipping charges if the product is damaged/different/defective than the listed one, even a very small difference makes the seller liable to cover return shipping charges otherwise buyer or marketplace should cover it just because they don’t “like” the product or “changed their mind”.
Other side of the coin would be to argue that its the cost of doing business i.e. bearing return charges. That argument should be understandable by most online sellers but it does not mean that marketplaces choose to abuse it and shove it down sellers throats. That phrase is in bold just because its funny, no relevance.
Most marketplaces have this “seller protection policy” in place which they do honor, but filing a proper claim and fighting for it maybe required to get that protection. Its like dealing with a ‘sarkari office’, primary protection of marketplaces against seller protection claims is that the claim is not proper, they will try to block or shoot down your claim in whichever way they can but then its on you to keep doing followup and keeping pointing things back to them if you know you are well within your rights and following their commandments to file the claim. Inquilab Zindabad!
As a broker, its on marketplaces to promote a valid return practice or information to their buyers, but they are also building the market (in India) currently, so can’t blame them completely. If marketplace was not there, a seller’s shop would not be there, if they don’t do it, order volume will go down gradually over time. So, everybody should live in peace and share return costs and hope that one day we will see valid return practices where buyers may also have to pay for return shipping. “What!!??!! Huh!!??!! What !!??!! Come Again? Did you really just say that? *Panic Everywhere*”
First let me clear carrier’s role and put them aside for the purpose of this rant session. They should be liable for damage to/of shipments but I don’t think any carrier these days is taking that responsibility, what they generally say now (in case of e-commerce shipments) is that seller is liable for damage due to bad or poor packing. But this also has a lot of loopholes, like if buyer says they got damaged item, carrier can reply that seller must have given damaged item only. Who is lying? Answer: No way to know. Buyer may have used it one day and broken it, seller may not have checked its broken or it may have been broken in transit by carrier which happens mostly due to poor packaging. So, now the carriers only take responsibility of lost shipments, for that also you will have to file claims and this and that and do 10 follow-ups. Will somebody open a service company which provides some actual, quality and decent service, already?
So, what actually happens (this is to the best of my knowledge as per current practices):
Paytm/Snapdeal/Flipkart: They do not charge any return fees to sellers and bear it themselves because of their easy (also read indiscriminate) return policies for buyers. They also offer seller protection against used/damaged goods which were returned, but please bear in mind that you have to meet everybody’s guidelines and file claims within proper timelines and provide valid proofs. Paytm & Snapdeal have an option where sellers can do fulfillment themselves but I do not have any knowledge of those mysterious programs so will not comment on their return policies. Snapdeal calls it Vendor Self Ship and Paytm calls it NLMD (Non Last Mile Delivery), guess they could have also called it GLSY (Get Lost & Ship Yourself).
*Snapdeal Seller Protection Claim hack* Submit a picture of your remarks like damage/different which you mentioned on the delivery guy’s run sheet (as per policy you are required to do that, Paytm also followed the suite). Regardless of damage/different, write on his sheet damage/different and keep a picture of it, so you can attach it with product pictures in case its actually damaged. Sometimes they will also say, buyer got it damaged only, I don’t know yet how to fight this one. Who is lying? Answer: No way to know.
First time I filed a claim and they (snapdeal) asked me for the proof that I mentioned these remarks, I was like What? Why would I take a picture of my remarks on DRS? Some would say its a reasonable, logical question. But apparently not, not in SD’s case. I was like show me, where its written in the guidelines and they were like no sir everybody does, you also have to do it or we cannot give damage claim. I was laughing my guts and crying my eyes all out at the same time. They will also not give you the claim on 7th day citing that you should have submitted within 7 days and they have a treasure trove of weird and funny reasons to deny any protection to you even after you pay them the “hafta” on a monthly basis. Ok, bad joke.
ShopClues: They sometimes let sellers authorize returns, sometimes they do it themselves, I am not very sure whats the practice exactly. But in all cases they will charge for return shipping, whether seller at fault or not, you can technically raise claim for unreasonable return chipping charges when product is not defective/damaged/different but I doubt it will be approved.
Problem is you need 1 resource dedicated to this task itself of checking and submitting and following up on claims.
eBay: The underdog runs a tight ship, buyers claims are not easily approved, only after seller acknowledges or if they actually see seller’s fault and buyer provides a return shipment proof. To buyer they provide some extra amount coupon to shop on eBay to cover their return shipping charge and do not charge sellers generally. If they provide buyer with a “eBay Powered Return” then they might charge your seller account. Seller protection is also provided reasonably without any “paperwork”. But if they do approve a claim unreasonably (mostly Refund Requests for non-delivery which are different than claims) and you are at loss, no matter what you do, how much you fight or argue, it will not be reversed, they will become like a faceless bot, I have not seen any success cases yet. You have to then beg the buyer to pay, which in some cases they will and in some they won’t. Here the fact in play is that most people are inherently good :p
Amazon: The soon to be largest e-commerce player in India (I will explain why later) leaves this part to your (the sellers) imagination and capabilities. For ATS (Easyship) and FBA (Fulfilled By Amazon) orders they will not charge any return shipment fee. The main problem area is seller fulfilled orders or in some cases even Easyship orders which buyers have to self ship. Amazon help states that it will be as per individual sellers return policies but that’s just a hollow promise (a teardrop rolls down my cheek).
Who is responsible for return shipping charges? Amazon Customer Care freely & openly tells customers that seller will pay return charges, regardless of seller’s return policy, then they also send sellers a message on behalf of buyers to do the same, best you ignore them. Then if you will raise a ticket with seller support regarding this, they will take so much time “anal-yze” your case that you will end up refunding yourself before it turns into an A-Z claim which is buyer’s nuclear warhead. Below is the most beautiful page on this topic that you will never find:
So best is you make a reasonable return shipping charge coverage policy as per rule of thumb above, show some courtesy to buyer if you are at fault and look at the bigger picture (mainly of avoiding negatives and claims) AND very important to communicate to buyer that upto what amount you will cover return shipping charge as they may send it from a very costly service and expect reimbursement of Rs. 750/- return shipping charge for an order totalling Rs. 728/- So a total refund of Rs. 1478/- (actual case) and return was because they did not like the product.
All parties involved must NOT choose to abuse, for a greener ($$$) tomorrow.